Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Harrang, Long, Gary and Rudnick way too transparent with potentially incriminating public records 04/29/2015

http://uomatters.com/2015/04/harrang-long-gary-and-rudnick-too-transparent-with-potentially-incriminating-public-records.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Bill Gary, Sharon Rudnick, and Randy Geller of UO’s HLGR law firm must be shitting their pants. I’m no lawyer, but sending a dump of emails that potentially incriminate your clients to the local newspaper, by mistake, seems unlikely to bring in the billable hours.

Josephine Woolington has the story in the RG, here:
Eugene School Board members allowed Superintendent Sheldon Berman to come up with his own exit plan to avoid the release of a negative performance review, which one board member said could result in his firing, newly obtained records show.
Board members also said in emails last year that if they couldn’t successfully negotiate a departure agreement with Berman, they planned to make his evaluation public and hire an investigator to look into unspecified actions by Berman.
Further, emails between board members show that some members went to great lengths to avoid meeting publicly or even in a closed-door session, in potential violation of state public meetings law. Other emails show that one board member — Beth Gerot — said she would destroy some public records related to Berman’s evaluation. It is a violation of state law for a public official to destroy public records.
The new information is contained in records that the law firm representing the Eugene School District inadvertently sent to The Register-Guard. The district contends the records should be kept secret, but the newspaper’s general counsel, Wendy Baker, said the district has “no legitimate basis” for keeping the records secret, and that the newspaper is publishing them because “elected officials should be held accountable to their constituents and their community.”
The school district sued The Register-­Guard in Lane County Circuit Court earlier this year to avoid disclosing 12 pages of records that the Lane County District Attorney’s Office ruled it must release. The district hired the Eugene law firm of Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C. to represent it in its lawsuit.
In the course of legal proceedings, the law firm last week sent the newspaper hundreds of unredacted emails regarding Berman’s job performance that The Register-Guard requested last year…
Wendy Baker makes me feel like a wimp for giving the UO president’s digital archives back to Bill Gary. With any luck, HLGR’s next mistake will be to mail that “zip drive” to Rich Read at the Oregonian, 1500 SW First Avenue, Portland, OR 97201.
But wait, there’s more, as a commenter points out. The documents potential implicate HLGR lawyer and former UO General Counsel Randy Geller’s wife (and school board member) Jennifer Geller in a conspiracy to break Oregon’s open meetings law:
Walston sent Geller a text message on March 7, 2014, that read: “Jennifer, I know (there) was talk of an (executive, closed-door) session to discuss Shelley’s performance as a last item on Monday. I talked with (then-district chief of staff) Barb (Bellamy) and Craig (Smith) yesterday and we cannot see how we could have — at this point in time — the discussion we seem to want — under (Oregon Revised Statutes) exemption. Craig talked to Shelley — at Shelley’s request after last week’s review. Craig suggested Shelley call individual board members for feedback. The hope is that Shelley will listen and be able to count to 4,” referring to a board majority that could effectively end his employment.
According to the emails, Walston said she would sequentially telephone each individual board member to update them on the process of evaluating Berman. It is a violation of Oregon public meetings law for public officials to hold sequential private one-on-one discussions with a board majority in order to deliberate toward a decision, an Oregon Circuit Court judge ruled in 2011.
Gerot wrote to all board members on March 9, 2014, that the district’s consultant, Lewis, would meet with her, in addition to board members Alicia Hays and Geller, to “communicate verbally and without attribution” what the consultant learned through her interviews with district employees.
The comments on the RG website are getting pretty interesting too.
Tagged . Bookmark the  permalink.

7 Responses to Harrang, Long, Gary and Rudnick way too transparent with potentially incriminating public records

  1. Wendy Baker Fan Club
    Hmm .. the archives release. And the Hershner Hunter report that hasn’t been seen. Gary’s hyperventilation that Rudnick didn’t write a summary. And then there’s this bit today from the article on the Eugene School Board and members action: 
    “Gerot wrote to all board members on March 9, 2014, that the district’s consultant, Lewis, would meet with her, in addition to board members Alicia Hays and Geller, to “communicate verbally and without attribution” what the consultant learned through her interviews with district employees.
    “She will then write a written summary, again without attribution, that will go to the entire board.”
    Interesting similarity.
  2. Not licensed in Oregon
    HLGR has already dropped from 32 to 24 attorneys, in 4 years. Expect more to now take their book to a firm with less stigma.
  3. Anon
    So Randy Geller’s law firm was trying to hide documents that potentially implicate his wife (and school board member) Jennifer Geller in a conspiracy to break the open meetings law? 
    Then someone at the firm “mistakenly” sent those documents to a reporter? Must be an interesting morning in the office.
    “Walston sent Geller a text message on March 7, 2014, that read: “Jennifer, I know (there) was talk of an (executive, closed-door) session to discuss Shelley’s performance as a last item on Monday. I talked with (then-district chief of staff) Barb (Bellamy) and Craig (Smith) yesterday and we cannot see how we could have — at this point in time — the discussion we seem to want — under (Oregon Revised Statutes) exemption. Craig talked to Shelley — at Shelley’s request after last week’s review. Craig suggested Shelley call individual board members for feedback. The hope is that Shelley will listen and be able to count to 4,” referring to a board majority that could effectively end his employment.
    According to the emails, Walston said she would sequentially telephone each individual board member to update them on the process of evaluating Berman. It is a violation of Oregon public meetings law for public officials to hold sequential private one-on-one discussions with a board majority in order to deliberate toward a decision, an Oregon Circuit Court judge ruled in 2011.
    Gerot wrote to all board members on March 9, 2014, that the district’s consultant, Lewis, would meet with her, in addition to board members Alicia Hays and Geller, to “communicate verbally and without attribution” what the consultant learned through her interviews with district employees.”
  4. The Truth
    Educational administrators as a collective have to be the most corrupt and least ethical group in Oregon public service. I wonder if this will be yet another situation where blatant violations of state law have occurred but none of the offenders end up punished because the DA chooses to ignore said violations.
    What’s funny is that HLGR has created a cottage industry for themselves as the go-to firm to represent these disreputable people, and this could send all that crashing down.
    • charlie
      “What’s funny is that HLGR has created a cottage industry for themselves as the go-to firm to represent these disreputable people, and this could send all that crashing down.”
      You gotta admit they take great photos….
  5. The Truth
    From the RG comments:
    “Could Wendy Baker please tell us what public interest this serves? If the RG is trying to pretend it is super duper big time journalism, this doesn’t do it. This is just opportunistic and prurient . . . maybe a sign of the times . . .”
    Guaranteed this commenter either works for one of HLGR or the school board, or is related to someone who does.
  6. SaveUofO
    This is priceless. The real question is whether someone in the AG’s office is going to step up. Keep up with those records requests and you might hit the jackpot with a treasure trove of documents that were never meant to see the light of day.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home